five out of six
the wildfire season was one of the striking discoveries i made after my move west. being from the rolling green hills of appalachia, forest fires aren't something i thought much about. we must have had them once in a while but it wasn't something one really worried about. imagine my surprise not only at the number of fires each year (about 1,100 in colorado alone) or the size and ferocity of some of them (the Idaho Sawtooth fire consumed 40,000 acres). what surprised me was how normal everyone around me found the fact that (a) eighty-five percent of forest fires are started by intentionally or carelessly and (b) we can't do much about it.
most of what we are suffering -- attacks on americans at home and abroad, dropping real wages, increasing race and class discrimination, deteriorating environmental conditions and personal health, the loss of personal rights and the growing sense that we are a pariah among nations -- is the direct result of intentional policy choices or run-of-the mill incompetence in the white house and congress. yet we seem to accept this as a fact of nature, like a lightning strike that starts a fire, rather than seeing it for what it is: elected officials intentionally pursuing policies that make life much more difficult for the vast majority of americans, the ones that do not have trust funds, political connections or top ten business school degrees and master-of-the-universe jobs.
in the same way that lightning starts one out of six forest fires, well-meaning policy choices sometimes turn out to have bad consequences. but that means that five out of six fires -- and five out of six bad policy outcomes -- arise out of intention or incompetence. five out of six happen, not because of an act of nature or well-meaning intention gone wrong, but because human beings wanted a particular result. people often start fires on purpose. they also make policy decisions with intent.
the good news? we can do something about it. resistance, like fire prevention, is not futile. it may be difficult. it may be exhausting. but it is not pointless. in some ways, political resistance is a good deal easier than fire prevention. we have more means to force policy change than the prevention expert has to enforce a campfire or smoking ban. the expert doesn't know who the backpackers are and can't see what they are doing, only what they have done. but we know where the administration lives. congress meets in the open (most of the time). government doesn't carelessly drop a butt into a pile of brush outside our view. what government does, it does on purpose and it does, mostly publicly, in press conferences, public hearings and published legislative agendas. what we can see, we can prevent.
five out of six. whenever you think, i can't make a difference, remind yourself of this number. remember that it is not lightning you are trying to stop -- an impossible task -- but an intentional act of political destruction. the truth is that the harmful effects of the vast majority of policy decisions can easily be seen before they happen. and if they can be seen, most of the time they can be stopped.
remember this, too. forest fires like the sawtooth detroy tens of thousands of acres of forest along with the wildlife, people and communities that depend on them to survive. they cost millions of dollars, and often the lives of firefighters, military personnel, police and civilians, to extinguish. the emotional, physical, environmental and psychic damage takes generations to heal. if you have ever seen one of these fires or its aftermath, let alone had your life changed by one, you know that the time, energy and money poured into prevention pays an incalculable return. the same thing goes for bad government. stopping it before it makes bad policy is so much less economically, socially and politically expensive as to be a no brainer.
if you don't step up and demand that our policy makers put away the gasoline and matches, who will? if you do not resist, if you do not refuse to endorse what is being done in your name, if you do not say it is wrong, if you do not vote, write, protest... how can you not take responsibility for the next big blaze?
five out of six. wildfire season is here and the world is tinder dry. a good time to make sure that the kids aren't playing with matches and fireworks, don't you think?
______
tags: politics, bush, government, resistance
most of what we are suffering -- attacks on americans at home and abroad, dropping real wages, increasing race and class discrimination, deteriorating environmental conditions and personal health, the loss of personal rights and the growing sense that we are a pariah among nations -- is the direct result of intentional policy choices or run-of-the mill incompetence in the white house and congress. yet we seem to accept this as a fact of nature, like a lightning strike that starts a fire, rather than seeing it for what it is: elected officials intentionally pursuing policies that make life much more difficult for the vast majority of americans, the ones that do not have trust funds, political connections or top ten business school degrees and master-of-the-universe jobs.in the same way that lightning starts one out of six forest fires, well-meaning policy choices sometimes turn out to have bad consequences. but that means that five out of six fires -- and five out of six bad policy outcomes -- arise out of intention or incompetence. five out of six happen, not because of an act of nature or well-meaning intention gone wrong, but because human beings wanted a particular result. people often start fires on purpose. they also make policy decisions with intent.
the good news? we can do something about it. resistance, like fire prevention, is not futile. it may be difficult. it may be exhausting. but it is not pointless. in some ways, political resistance is a good deal easier than fire prevention. we have more means to force policy change than the prevention expert has to enforce a campfire or smoking ban. the expert doesn't know who the backpackers are and can't see what they are doing, only what they have done. but we know where the administration lives. congress meets in the open (most of the time). government doesn't carelessly drop a butt into a pile of brush outside our view. what government does, it does on purpose and it does, mostly publicly, in press conferences, public hearings and published legislative agendas. what we can see, we can prevent.
five out of six. whenever you think, i can't make a difference, remind yourself of this number. remember that it is not lightning you are trying to stop -- an impossible task -- but an intentional act of political destruction. the truth is that the harmful effects of the vast majority of policy decisions can easily be seen before they happen. and if they can be seen, most of the time they can be stopped.
remember this, too. forest fires like the sawtooth detroy tens of thousands of acres of forest along with the wildlife, people and communities that depend on them to survive. they cost millions of dollars, and often the lives of firefighters, military personnel, police and civilians, to extinguish. the emotional, physical, environmental and psychic damage takes generations to heal. if you have ever seen one of these fires or its aftermath, let alone had your life changed by one, you know that the time, energy and money poured into prevention pays an incalculable return. the same thing goes for bad government. stopping it before it makes bad policy is so much less economically, socially and politically expensive as to be a no brainer.
if you don't step up and demand that our policy makers put away the gasoline and matches, who will? if you do not resist, if you do not refuse to endorse what is being done in your name, if you do not say it is wrong, if you do not vote, write, protest... how can you not take responsibility for the next big blaze?
five out of six. wildfire season is here and the world is tinder dry. a good time to make sure that the kids aren't playing with matches and fireworks, don't you think?
______
tags: politics, bush, government, resistance
18 Comments:
Brilliantly put! Here in Australia it is our bush fire 'season'. Most are purposefully started and some by actual firefighters themselves ..who are fascinated by it all. Using fires as an analogy for the politics of the greedy is a wonderful example of the way you knit too events together.
More should have your realisations instead of feeling it is all just too much to face.
Prevention in everything is preferable to having to 'put it out' once it has started.
Great piece.
the burning Bush, eh??
happy full moon friday 13th, wch. like the new profile pic. thanks for showing me technorati tags... - jennimi
i believe i am as fascinated with everything you say as you are!
What is this, some sort of attempt at subliminal bloging. If your goal was to piss me off, well done. If you have something worth saying than you shouldnt have to trick people into reading it.
I think you are right about politicians using gasoline to purposely start a fire. That happens all the time by politicians in general. The worst part of the problem though is finding out who started the blaze, especially when those people begin piling wet wood on the fire. It makes for a whole lot of smoke and severely limits our ability to even see the fire let alone who is feeding it.Mr. Clinton was encouraged to take action by leading Democratic Senators including John Kerry. Their view points only changed when it appeared that President Bush's popularity rating might be getting a little too high. One might even upon closer examination of the events leadinf up to this say that the first match was tossed on the gasoline as early as 1998. Mr. Clinton ordered a huge 4 day bombing campaign because he was 100% certain Iraq had WMDs. In December of 2001 several Democrat Senators including John Kerry sent a letter to the white house urging President Bush to take action against Saddam Hussein because : “There is no doubt that … Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of an elicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.” Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001
These are the people now throwing wet wood on the fire they themselves started. Not to put out the fire, but to make as much of a smoke screen as possible. To say Bush lied is probably a true statement. To say that we wouldn't be in this war if John Kerry or any other Democrat had been elected President is not only false it is evidence that the person making the statement has one of two problems. Either they they have too much smoke in their eyes to plainly see the truth or they have an arm load of wet wood.
dear anonymous,
you feel tricked because i used a metaphor to describe a politic situation?
i truly hope you didn't read a word more than you wished.
- wch
oob -
i like the analogy: an armload of wet wood. i think that we have to look at each and every politician we have supported and see if they have been consistent, honest and open about their views and intentions.
if they haven't, throw them out. simple as that.
clever - especially the "pay off".
love your writing style.
alas, i once felt relatively "empowered" and as though i did indeed have the ability to participate and change the course of fires,or at least, elimnate those who started them for the wrong reason at the wrong time in the wrong place. but although our govenerment seemingly operates in public - it actually doesn't and an average joe truly has little impact. despite that, i write letters, participate in protests, vote (getting harder and harder to do so productively when the choices are really nonchoices and the count doesn't matter anyway - yeah - i ain't over it...), cajole and force my students to read, read, read, and think, think, think, and question, question, question. i also dutifully register would-be voters. alas, i am going through the motions - the fires rage and both unintentionally and purposefully and its harder than hell to tell the fire prevention techniques from the incendiary ones.
keep writing- i'll be sure to check back. come and visit me as well if you like.
regards, bird
p.s. wish i had the time to write you apparently have!
it might not be so simple to throw out crappy leaders if a majority of people actually think those leaders are pretty great, or can't tell that the canister in their hands is filled with gasoline. sometimes the politicians themselves are unaware that they are about to start a blaze. which i think points to the need for a better educated public just as much as it does to a more politically engaged one. or maybe you can't have one without the other.
interesting blog. glad i found it.
i think you have achieved your goal of being ordinary. i am surprised you are a dog year person. no trust fund? no top 10 biz school sheepskin? boo fucking hoo you baby. if you are a dog, you must be a teacup poodle.
and its all because america sucks. you dont know what real environmental degradation is until you have lived in the 3rd world. it takes a spoiled narcissitic navel gazer to whine on about loss of wages, and class discrimination and loss of personal rights. really? try reading up on what has happened to bloggers in china or iran and then whimper to us about your loss of rights. if you can name three rights you have lost because of the state i would be astonished. blog that!
i bet you can't.
yeah, its a rough life to have DSL and the luxury of time to rant on a blog constantly. america sucks don't it?
you are just a meme pimp and a desperate needer of attention. you wear indignance like a bad fashion. like a mall full of pierced and tatooed teenagers thinking they are all counter culture individuals. all ten million of them. want to be a real person? try appreciating the beauties for a change. and picking up a good history book wouldnt hurt, either.
even a cursory look at your profile picture demonstrates just how cake your life is compared to the real world standard, and like the spoiled child of rich parents you can have a foot stomping tantrum cause you only have a beamer and not the the newest porsche.
no wonder you enjoy pornography, the sex dope for the hopelessly lazy. it is the same with your world view. you expect it all to just flow down on you cause you want it. you are weak. good dogs everywhere are weeping from association with the likes of you.
/bark bark bark
government doesn't carelessly drop a butt into a pile of brush outside our view. what government does, it does on purpose and it does, mostly publicly, in press conferences, public hearings and published legislative agendas. what we can see, we can prevent.
Oh, ko! WCH, thou art ever so much more optimistic and trusting of our government than I am.
@ OOB, your post is the first time I've seen a lot of this information. Consider me guarded and suspicious.
@ jennimi, a finely turned pun.
Sorry, a P.S. to Previous...
Why is it that blog readers who find a blog - for whatever reason - to be annoying feel compelled to make "anonymous" comments, rather than a) logging in and fighting fair; or b) just hitting the "Next Blog" button?
Diane-
Psychologically speaking, when one lashes out at another, they usually are identifying something they dislike within themselves.
It would make sense that the person did not take responsibility because they then might have a mirror held to them in return...or maybe they just do not have an account here.
Regardless, I thought it was rude, but at least WCH incites passion...positive or negative...passion is passion.
Oh, Iran, I yearn for your dusty kiss, your soft, supple limbs which now have not thought of lush as the singular grain blows across the expanse: Sahara. I will consume you.
- your friend Dubya
/bark bark bark
okay homies. I've made myself available to you.
Just passing through. Thank you for illustration of our collective problems. I disagree with anon, you do take the time to see the beauty, even to the extent of imparting some into this ugly of a topic. Bird, don't go through the motions. Try new techniques.
And Anon, come pick on someone like me pig f***er. I'll play.
"And Anon, come pick on someone like me pig f***er. I'll play."
Nice language mr smiley face bio hazard.
okay, your'e on!
I will prepare my farm team for you.
/barkbarkbark
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home